thesinglesjukebox:

CHANCE THE RAPPER FT. AB-SOUL - SMOKE AGAIN
[5.78]


Look into my eyes, for I am about to teach you about rhombi…

Crystal Xia: Acid Rap made me into a Chance fan, but “Smoke Again” is probably one of my least favorite tracks on it. Chance’s voice is particularly grating here, and that quality is brought out even more by the one-two punch of his drag out the last woooord of each line flow and that annoying siren noise in the hook. Ab-Soul has never sounded so uninspired.
[5]

Anthony Easton: “Lean all on the square, that’s a fucking rhombus” is the most delightful and mathematically accurate drug reference I have heard in recent memory. That I cannot tell whether it’s “potty” or “party” skeeves me a bit. Also their Dukes reference seems a little inaccurate.
[4]

Patrick St. Michel: “Smoke Again” doesn’t quite break into the top level of Acid Rap - that zone belongs to “Good Ass Intro,” “Pusha Man” and “Chain Smoker” - but comes in a very respectable fourth on the year’s best rap album so far. Those horn farts sound great, and are wisely never turned up loud enough to drown out Chance in all his near-raspy glory. He reminds me a little of Kendrick Lamar in his ability to bend his voice frequently, albeit Chance does it less for thematic reasons and more so because he seems to be getting a kick out of it. Ab-Soul’s bit is alright, but this one is all about showcasing Chance.
[8]

Alfred Soto: The way he leans into his whine at the end of verses is the most irritating mannerism since Ezra Koenig’s electro-chipmunk sample in “Ya Hey.” But as a De La Soul fan I’ve always got time for potty references, stupid rhymes and all.
[5]

Jonathan Bogart: The falsetto whine Chance (or somebody) employs as part of the background is reminding me of something from the 90s, but I can’t tell what. Hippy revivalism? G-funk? Jock Jams? It’s all part of the DNA of this song anyway, driven overachievers playing at lazy underachievement and almost passing.
[6]

Brad Shoup: More good vocalizing here; it’s almost like click tracks for the highest horn player. The brass we have is so close to sour, slowed like everything else here. Were the drums recorded? If so, I bet the drummer made amazing faces while going tick-bum-tick.
[6]

Jer Fairall: His rhymes are witty without being revelatory, his flow is adroitly playful without completely dodging a certain air of frat-boy smarminess, and the production—-well, this is just a mixtape track, right? In other words, I kinda get the hype, but I’m not yet willing to label him as anything greater than “promising” at this point.
[5]

Edward Okulicz: Those slowed-down horn parps and the slow-decay of the drumbeat are trippy enough on their own, and an ideal backdrop for Chance’s woozy flow and focused dedication to a rhyming scheme. His use of voice has a childlike sense of experimentation and play to it, how he seems to produce a line here like he’s grinning, and another like he’s gurning. Ab-Soul, on the other hand is a little on the childish side. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, it’s just that he seems a bit lucid for the track.
[6]

Alex Ostroff: Chance continues the trend (started by “Juice” and “NaNa”) of releasing tracks (that I love but are) unlikely to win over those seeking an entry point but who find his vocals slightly grating. The key to “Smoke Again” is the contrast between the screwed hook and woozy horns and his exaggeratedly nasal whine; this is some deliberate, thumb-in-your-eye, messing around for fun delivery. The palpable delight in the way he leans into the line about the rhombus speaks for itself. Still, when you have material as ingratiating and likeable as Acid Rap’s opening or closing triads, or the central trio — which include a swoonworthy interlude and a track great enough to make me enjoy Childish Gambino — putting out a video for a great track that is the definition of a grower is confusing.
[7]

[Read and comment on The Singles Jukebox ]

I was tempted to bump ‘Smoke Again’ up to an [8], but much as I love the track - and all of Acid Rap - it really doesn’t feel like a single to me. That said, who am I to second-guess the album/mixtape campaign of a twenty year-old dude who’s seemingly managed to take over the entire Rap Internet in just under a month. (Fine, with a year or two of groundwork first, but still.)

If you haven’t heard Acid Rap yet, WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR DOWNLOAD IT HERE.

Our reviews as a whole probably underrate this track and definitely are not representative of how great this album is.

thesinglesjukebox:

LANA DEL REY - YOUNG AND BEAUTIFUL
[5.18]


One out of two’s still good, Leo.

Patrick St. Michel: One complaint aimed at The Great Gatsby — the book, I have no idea about the movie — is that everything is a symbol, to the point of excess. A fair enough critique but I think it’s still better than the opposite - SparkNotes obviousness. “Young And Beautiful” features no subtlety, everything Lana Del Rey sings about being direct (“will you still love me/when I’m no longer beautiful?”). It’s a touch too straightforward, betraying the unsavory emotions that lurked beneath her best songs (“Video Games,” mostly). Still, like all her music, it earns some points for just sounding so grand, even if what’s sung over it isn’t at all.
[5]

Anthony Easton: The Gatsby soundtrack is brilliant, better than the movie at updating the tragic amorality of Gatsby’s relationship to both money and people. Lana Del Rey, with her languor, and her cleverness at persona-building, plus the updating of the jazz chanteuse persona would seem to be a perfect fit. But it might have been too perfect considering Luhrman’s skills mostly rest on the integration of contemporary modes into melodramatic histories and recasting that integration into an overly processed spectacle — a filmic reproduction of a music hall re-working of an operatic practice of a textual source — a matryoshka doll effect. Rey’s inability to go past the first second or level of that practice is a disappointment. However, there are things to recommend this: her tone is silvery, her ache of loss is earnest enough, I enjoyed how she delivered lines that should just collapse into absurdity (electric soul), and even the pleading to God is both exquisite and terribly placed.
[6]

Alfred Soto: As those strings saw away, Del Rey is in her own Deanna Durbin vehicle, her cool nasality giving confessions (rhyming his “body” with “makes me wanna party”) genuine camp value.
[5]

Jer Fairall: Overstated, garish and tasteless, Lana Del Rey and Baz Luhrmann movies are practically made for each other. I can actually somewhat get on board with the particular melodramatic sweep of this one, at least as long as she’s wistfully evoking “hot summer days / rock and roll / the way you’d play for me at your show;” even if only the 1/3 of that equation makes sense in context, it’s a lovely little moment nonetheless. But any Lana Del Rey song is always going to leave her often cataclysmically awful lyrics to contend with (“will you still love me when I got nothing but my aching soul” isn’t even the biggest howler here) and the sad fact that, as a vocalist, I’m finding less and less to distinguish her from Christina Perri anymore.
[5]

Mallory O’Donnell: Myopic, self-obsessed plodding dirge masquerading as a paean to a killer guy, pretending (worse yet) to be modern (“makes me wanna party?”) despite the pre-Prohibition vocal drag. There’s nothing wrong with singing per se, why you wanna wear it out so bad?
[2]

Katherine St Asaph: Lana Del Rey is perfect for Gatsby. She’s exactly the singer Gatsby would hire. And though the pace is stodgy and the bridge worse, she’s better on material that demands gravitas (earned or not) than when she’s just trolling everyone. Or maybe I’m just overrating the parts where her voice sounds like Helen Marnie.
[5]

Brad Shoup: The percussive strokes sound like shovels hitting dirt, or maybe buckets bailing water. The combination of orchestral support and mundane concerns have borne fruit for her; replacing the details with this tense little ball of text/subtext is kind of a downgrade. Most pop music has been made knowing (and ignoring) the answer to Del Rey’s question. I guess every once in a while, someone’s gotta say it.
[5]

Will Adams: It’s her way with melody, I think, that lets me forget that a song titled “Young and Beautiful” for an expensive Gatsby adaptation is the year’s biggest moment of self-parody. Well, that and the body/party rhyme. The lovely pre-chorus – when Lana crescendos as the strings swell – reminded me of her songwriting craft, the somber affect that so clearly separates empathy from sympathy. Yes, diminishing returns apply here, but for the moment I can still enjoy her.
[7]

Alex Ostroff: “All that grace, all that body, all that face makes me wanna party,” Lana intones, before declaring her faith that her man will love her past the horizon of youth and beauty, but “Body Party” — textually corporeal, visceral and lustful — effortlessly signifies devotion, spirituality and romance that all the orchestral grandeur in the world can’t muster here. Lana signifies ennui and dissatisfaction, which works best undercutting her lyrics implicitly, à la “Video Games,” rather than underpinning explicit insecurities. If I remain unmoved, I also remain oddly transfixed.
[4]

Sabina Tang: These days, the furore around Lana Del Rey’s initial videos seems beside the point, first and foremost because her execution improved thereafter by leaps and bounds. Like Stefani Germanotta, Lizzie Grant spent her first two successful albums refining her songwriting and doubling down on her aesthetics. Like Lady Gaga, Lana Del Rey is less a coherent alter ego than a concept-nexus, a brand. One is a Lana Del Rey Girl in the same sense that one might be a Valley Girl, an Uptown Girl, a Vargas Girl… The commonality of the Lana Del Rey Girl — “Video Games“‘s girlfriend, “Ride“‘s biker moll, “National Anthem“‘s First Lady, “Cola“‘s home-wrecker, the girl in “American” whose brown-skinned lover is only like an American — is that she is much seen (being beautiful) and little heard (being dim, or at any rate not a feminist). She imagines life as a movie, is assigned no lines, and ends her life in a meat freezer. She is a vessel for the hopes and dreams of men; no one wants to hear her talk, other women least of all. Lana Del Rey gives her a voice — always first person, never the observer’s third — but the crux of the project is that she doesn’t sugarcoat. The Lana Del Rey Girl opens her mouth to reveal that she is dim, venal, romanticizes destructive love and has an unhealthy need for male approval. She’s erotically drawn to older men and sweetly calls their wives “bitch” under her breath. She probably can’t spell feminist. In other words, she’s Daisy Buchanan’s original “beautiful little fool.” So who better than Lana to put words in Daisy’s mouth and do her narcissism justice? What other female singer-songwriter voice can ask and answer, “Will you still love me when I’m no longer young and beautiful — I know you will, I know you will”? Who else can sigh in all seriousness, “You make me shine — like diamonds”? This may be a bog-standard Paradise-era cut, but the Luhrmann Gatsby is Lana Del Rey’s Gatsby, through and through.
[8]

Jonathan Bogart: Daisy Buchanan’s theme, I take it. But Lana Del Rey’s voice still only sounds like a parody of money.
[5]

[Read, comment and vote on The Singles Jukebox ]

I actually managed to churn out some writing of my own for the first time in months.

On the other hand, it was about Lana Del Rey.

ourroyalcustomers:

These guys know what’s up.

ourroyalcustomers:

These guys know what’s up.

In 2012 Kanye West introduced most of the world to Chief Keef, via the G.O.O.D. Music remix of Keef’s local hit “I Don’t Like.” (I know, I know, you knew about Keef before Kanye, but most of America can’t touch your impeccable blog game.) This was something of a confusing move at the time, at least for me; the remix wasn’t an improvement by any means, and it had been a while since Kanye had shown significant interest in preserving his Chicago affiliations, but there he was, shouting out all the local rappers, putting on a 17-year-old kid from one of the most fucked up neighborhoods in the country. But I know why Kanye did the remix now (and I think he knows he didn’t improve upon the original either). He needed to confront white America with what they presumed at the time was their worst nightmare: a young black male who grew up in hell and no longer gave a single fuck, who used unfamiliar words and rapped about guns and money and drugs. You know, rapper stuff. (NOTE: When I say “white America” please know I am not being all-inclusive. Like, fuck, I’m white, I get that there are many white people who fully support and understand the racial and socio-political issues at hand here, and that I am being reductive by dichotomizing it into simply “black” vs “white” to begin with. Consider it shorthand for the type of non-black American unconcerned by or complicit in the perpetuation of these issues.)In reality though, Chief Keef isn’t white America’s worst nightmare. Because while he scares the living shit out of them in person, he fits neatly into the trope that many racist white Americans need young black men to fit into: violent, uneducated, aimless. They expect this kind of character, and in turn know how to strip him of his humanity, dismiss him, and avoid him. Kanye West is white America’s worst nightmare. Because as much as one may attempt to dismiss him—by calling him an asshole or classless or deranged or various other adjectives that fill the comment sections of literally every article about him—you still have to turn on your regularly scheduled late night comedy program and stare him in the face. You can’t avoid Kanye. He’s made very sure of that.

SENSITIVE THUG: WHO WILL SURVIVE IN AMERICA? WHO WILL SURVIVE IN AMERICA? WHO WILL SURVIVE IN AMERICA? WHO WILL SURVIVE IN AMERICA?

This is excellent, read it in full. On the Kardashian bit in particular:

  • Every era, for centuries, has had its few celebrities or cultural products whose name people who are neither as enlightened nor as funny as they think invoke as, with implied caps, THE DOWFALL OF SOCIETY. Who they end up being depends on a lot of factors: winner-takes-all name recognition by tabloid-cover or headline-feed or ad-placement osmosis (which is why Miley Cyrus is an example and Demi Lovato is not); their appeal to 13-year-old girls (which is why boy bands are reviled en masse and by name and, I dunno, Myspace emo is not); their appeal to 40-year-old women in Middle America (which is why Fifty Shades of Grey is an example and James Patterson* is not); and then race, implied class and/or new money, weight, etc., meaning a large portion of the backlash here comes from people using “Kardashian” as a synecdoche for “THE DOWNFALL OF AMERICAN CULTURE, AS EMBODIED BY NON-WASPY, NON-TINY, DOWNMARKET-CODING WOMEN.”**
  • Go a step farther and you find the people who criticize Kanye West dating a celebrity to juice his own celebrity, in the music and out. It seems like a fairer, more thought-out point until you notice everyone they are or were silent about, namely every celebrity couple, because this is how celebrity couples work by industry default. (And have since forever. Read history, of any era; if you want convenience and relative recency, read Anne Helen Petersen’s Scandals of Classic Hollywood series. Nothing is new.) Since it’s Kanye we’re talking about, here’s a good example: Taylor Swift, who dropped Red while she dated a Kennedy and the most saleable One Direction member, and worked both of these into her music. Somehow none of the Kanye pundits brought the hand-waving freakoutery.*** 

* Yes, I know Patterson has institutional immunity, and that women also read him. I know because patterson, Sue Grafton and Patricia Cornwell make up about 60% of my mother’s reading habits, to the point where it’s a family joke that she won’t buy a book if there’s no murder in the title. This may explain a lot about me and my family.

** Kim codes white in relation to Kanye, but it’s kind of like how Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is either called white or not depending on who wants to make which point.

*** There was HWFO, but butthurt Louis Tomlinson stans are different than yuppies tsk-tsking about Kanye’s artistry being tainted.

(via katherinestasaph)

Original piece and commentary both well worth reading.

(via parklakespeakers)

Already reblogged Meaghan’s magnificent piece earlier today, but Katherine’s commentary is, as always, well worth reading.

On Ethnic Fashion and Chanel Cruise

vidalwuu:

To clarify, I really liked the Chanel show. I prefer Karl ditching the grandiose gimmicks and over-accessorized styling in favour of his more commercial fare with a slightly impractical editorial flair. The restrained palette of creams, black, white and navy is endlessly practical and flexible to all kinds of people, and reinforces the ethos of Chanel without beating you over the head with it. Plus, I can’t resist the tons-o’-pearls look.

Also, I’m calling it right here and now: the tunic-pants silhouette is going to be the defining silhouette of this decade. It’s all we got so far, and the most genuinely new thing the industry’s done in a while.

(Reposting because he posted a link on his Tumblr and I’d rather he get the notes.)

In the continued adventures of promoting my boo’s content because I’m too busy with work to create much of my own, vidalwuu uses the nebulous and vaguely ridiculous ‘Resort’ season and Chanel’s Cruise show as jumping-off points for a pretty great article about cultural appropriation and racism in the fashion industry.

An excerpt that captures the main thrust, but there are some lovely tangents, so you should click through and read the whole thing:

The entire concept of ‘Resort’ then—a season invented by retailers to refresh their over-photographed, over-advertised inventory after three months rather than six—is centred on commercialism and travel, and by extension, this tourist gaze that’s obsessed with escaping the mundane and delighting in the foreign. In the industry, commercial viability translates into simpler fabrications and easier propositions instead of the experimental (or in industry speak, editorial) pieces in order to sell stock faster, while reinforcing the tourist (and ultimately capitalist) approach to consuming the ethnic and non-familiar.

Lagerfeld has often said that he prefers imagining the inspirations of his collections rather than researching them, giving him more license to play with the aesthetic codes of his subject. That’s all well and good, but what implications does that have for a country like Singapore, so steeped in historical British and Japanese rule? Without researching the culture, the most logical references that Lagerfeld would draw on would be the most dominant ones, and the most dominant ones are from the good ‘ole days of imperialism. Cricket bats don’t signify Singapore; they signify British people taking Singapore for themselves.

thexxsoundboard:

The wonderful Jessie Ware joined us onstage at Night+Day in Berlin. We did a version of Modjo ‘Lady’ + Stardust ‘Music Sounds Better With You’ over Jamie’s edit of Sunset. It was such a joy to share the stage with her, she has an incredible voice! Here is a video filmed from side of stage. 
xx The xx

Oh My God. I can’t. Why was I not there? ~sigh~

WHO WILL SURVIVE IN AMERICA? WHO WILL SURVIVE IN AMERICA? WHO WILL SURVIVE IN AMERICA? WHO WILL SURVIVE IN AMERICA?

3lc3lc3lc:

image

What in the fuck was that Kanye?
I told you to do some shit for the kids
You can give me your muhfucking graduation ticket right now
You will not walk across that stage, you won’t slide across that stage
Muhfucka can’t pull you across that stage Kanye
Who told you, see, I told you to do something uplifting
I’m trynna get you out here with these white people and this how you gone do me?
You know what? You’s a nigga
And I don’t mean that in no nice way
Had little kids sing about the shit, the joke’s on you
You throw your muhfuckin’ hands in the air, and wave good-bye to everybody
Cause you getting the fuck out of this campus
Muhfucka what you gone do now?

I’m no longer confused, but don’t tell anybody.
I’m about to break the rules
But don’t tell anybody.
(“Graduation Day”)

In 2012 Kanye West introduced most of the world to Chief Keef, via the G.O.O.D. Music remix of Keef’s local hit “I Don’t Like.” (I know, I know, you knew about Keef before Kanye, but most of America can’t touch your impeccable blog game.) This was something of a confusing move at the time, at least for me; the remix wasn’t an improvement by any means, and it had been a while since Kanye had shown significant interest in preserving his Chicago affiliations, but there he was, shouting out all the local rappers, putting on a 17-year-old kid from one of the most fucked up neighborhoods in the country. But I know why Kanye did the remix now (and I think he knows he didn’t improve upon the original either). He needed to confront white America with what they presumed at the time was their worst nightmare: a young black male who grew up in hell and no longer gave a single fuck, who used unfamiliar words and rapped about guns and money and drugs. You know, rapper stuff. (NOTE: When I say “white America” please know I am not being all-inclusive. Like, fuck, I’m white, I get that there are many white people who fully support and understand the racial and socio-political issues at hand here, and that I am being reductive by dichotomizing it into simply “black” vs “white” to begin with. Consider it shorthand for the type of non-black American unconcerned by or complicit in the perpetuation of these issues.)

In reality though, Chief Keef isn’t white America’s worst nightmare. Because while he scares the living shit out of them in person, he fits neatly into the trope that many racist white Americans need young black men to fit into: violent, uneducated, aimless. They expect this kind of character, and in turn know how to strip him of his humanity, dismiss him, and avoid him.

Kanye West is white America’s worst nightmare. Because as much as one may attempt to dismiss him—by calling him an asshole or classless or deranged or various other adjectives that fill the comment sections of literally every article about him—you still have to turn on your regularly scheduled late night comedy program and stare him in the face. You can’t avoid Kanye. He’s made very sure of that.

I’m not going to get too deep into breaking down the messages in “New Slaves” and “Black Skinhead”; these articles have done a good job of that already: http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/the_truth_in_kanyes_anti_prison_rap/  http://theweek.com/article/index/244449/the-politics-behind-kanye-wests-new-slaves  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/11/cca-prison-industry_n_3061115.html  I’d rather respond to the overwhelming criticisms that have already emerged in response to his premiere of the songs, “New Slaves” in particular, this weekend. Most of these criticisms fall into three categories: He’s A Hypocrite, This Isn’t New, and He Wants Attention.

Lost in translation with a whole fucking nation
They said I was the abomination of Obama’s nation
Well that’s a pretty bad way to start a conversation
(“Power”)

This is the easiest and most obvious way to attempt to dismantle the messages in “New Slaves.” “But how can a millionaire who just impregnated his millionaire girlfriend critique a culture of conspicuous consumption in which he participates?” Let’s get the Kim thing out of the way from the start, considering its total irrelevance (I’m going to quote David Turner’s tweet from yesterday here: “If You Use Kim Kardashian To Dismiss Kanye’s Music STOP AND LOOK AT HOW YOU EVALUATE MUSIC AND PROBABLY JUST STOP DOING IT ALL TOGETHER”). Most of the bitterness and accusations of the so-called hypocrisy of Kanye’s relationship with Kim seem eerily compatible with the lyrics of “Black Skinhead”: “Enter the kingdom/ But watch who you bring home/ They see a black man with a white woman/ At the top floor they gone come to kill King Kong.” Furthermore, since when is it acceptable to judge an artist on the merit of who they love? With what kind of partner would you feel comfortable seeing Kanye? Regardless, it doesn’t belong in this discussion.
Questioning why a rich black man has a right to express anger at the plight of less rich black people is essentially asking, “Well, you’re gonna be okay, so what’s the problem?” Kanye’s wealth and participation in consumerist culture (by selling records and concert tickets and having a clothing line, as though he couldn’t possibly be doing these things as a multi-genre artist and restless creative, but instead is surely just trying to cash out—because he totally needs that extra Air Yeezy dough) cheapens his message to certain critics. This is because they are approaching the hyper-consumerist culture Kanye references when he says “What you want a Bentley, fur coat and diamond chain?/ All you blacks want all the same things”  as a force that is very bad, certainly; but not as a force that has enslaved them, personally, into a permanent underclass and then gone on to laugh at them for accepting the ideals and signifiers of this culture.

Kanye has transcended the class that is bearing the brunt of the issues at hand in “New Slaves”, and thus is expected to gratefully shut the fuck up and let it slide (“throw him some Maybach keys/ Fuck it, c’est la vie”). He now belongs to the same social class that has essentially trapped his people, via the “DEA teamed up with the CCA” compounded with “broke nigga racism vs rich nigga racism.” Kanye is not a “new slave” in the same sense as the victims of the prison industrial complex, but he is still trapped in a world that expects him to not only be complicit with the struggle of his people, but to be appreciative that he is not one of them. And on top of all that, while he gets to exist in the world of the 1%, having the money and signifiers of success still aren’t enough to make his (white) 1% peers actually even respect him. Here is where Kanye’s most misunderstood quality is of great significance: for all the talk of his inflated ego (a good deal of which is accurate), Kanye hates himself more than he loves himself, and his self-loathing has only grown as he has accumulated wealth—the very thing he’d once been deluded into believing would be the answer to everything. When “Power” was released as a single in 2010, I don’t think too many people (myself included) saw the line “No one man should have all this power” as much more than another grandiose rap boast. In fact, he was being literal.

And for as miserable as his wealth has made him by this point (see “Hit the mall, pick up some Gucci/ Now ain’t nothing new but your shoes” from 2011’s “Murder to Excellence”), he anticipated this back in 2003 in the “College Dropout” days. Despite being more narratively framed and mildly worded, “All Falls Down” is very thematically similar to “New Slaves” a decade prior: “Shine because they hate us/ Floss cause we the greatest/ We tryna buy back our 40 acres,” and yet—and yet!—after you succeed in buying back those 40 acres, “Even if you in a Benz you still a nigga in a coupe,” “Because they made us hate ourself and love they wealth,” “And the white man get paid off of all of that.” Sounds pretty familiar—yes, gasp! in the “good old days” before he “sold out” and “lost touch with himself” Kanye was talking about the same things! Not to mention it acknowledges and does away with accusations of hypocrisy on its own: “I ain’t even gon act holier than thou/ Cause fuck it, I went to Jacob with 25 thou…” Like, duh guys, he’s painfully aware that he’s part of the problem. He hates himself for it. He’s still trapped in it. And now he’s going to try and find a way out.

Face it, Jerome get more time than Brandon
And at the airport they check all through my bag
And tell me that it’s random
But, we stay winnin
(“Gorgeous”)


(As a side note: I’m very interested to see what happens with regard to Kanye’s corporate ties as “Yeezus” starts to pick up speed. Because let’s look at what’s happened recently when a black man starts saying shit that makes his sponsors uncomfortable—and yes, it’s cheap to compare Lil Wayne and Rick Ross’ recent loss of sponsorships with what Kanye’s doing right now, but simply for reference: they will snatch that endorsement and that check away with the quickness, but not before they capitalize on your “urban” appeal without really knowing shit about your music to begin with. Because up until the point that you start to make people nervous, as stated in 2005’s “Crack Music,” “This dark diction has become America’s addiction/ Those who aren’t even black use it.” Real trap shit.)

A lot of critics of “New Slaves” seem perturbed by the fact that Kanye is not the first to espouse or rap about racism and political ideals. I feel like “…and?” is a sufficient response, but to elaborate: this criticism suggests not only that it is not worthy to revisit topics initiated by, say, the Black Panthers or Public Enemy or Gil Scott Heron (all of whom Kanye is intimately familiar with—let’s revisit “Crack Music”: “How we stop the Black Panthers? Ronald Reagan has the answer/ You hear that? What Gil Scot was Heron”) because, you know, been there done that, but also that the context and platform of Kanye’s approach are unremarkable and precedented. They are not. No figure in mainstream culture, with as universal and inescapable and unremovable a presence in the average person’s life, has challenged that very culture so blatantly in decades. The ideals of Public Enemy are as relevant today as they were in the 80’s, but hip-hop was nowhere near as dominant and omnipresent a cultural force as it is at this moment; to compare the reach of their messages is silly. Upper-middleclass white families did not have to deal with Public Enemy if they didn’t want to. Similarly with politically-minded “noise rap” artists that have been name-dropped in reviews of Kanye’s new material—it’s all well and good for Death Grips and Blackie and even Killer Mike to espouse similar messages and sounds (and honestly, the sonic qualities of “New Slaves” and “Black Skinhead” are hardly at the top of the list of why they’re important), but none of them have anywhere near the amount of visibility and influence as Kanye, even if they did hit it first. The position from which Kanye is delivering his message is essential to the message’s power; for this same reason, while it may seem crass that a pop star be the one delivering these messages, from a logical perspective it’s perfectly effective (returning to “Crack Music”: “And we’ve been hanging from the same tree ever since/ Sometimes I feel like the music is the only medicine”).

Tell me how do you respond to students
And refresh the page and restart the memory
Respark the soul and rebuild the energy
We stop the ignorance, we kill the enemy
(“Dark Fantasy”)

Many people seem to think that Kanye’s gestures are ultimately empty because, you know, he’s an asshole, remember, and an egomaniac, and he’s clearly just reaching for new ways to get attention. People in current positions of comfort and stability are so willing to dismiss the transgressive thoughts of an angry black man that they will use any convenient excuse to diminish from them; if someone says something that makes you uncomfortable, why not immediately change the subject to his girlfriend’s ass or that time he yelled at a papparazzi or that time he got drunk and embarrassed a white girl? When was it exactly that Kanye shifted, in the eyes of the mainstream, from lovable polo-wearing backpacker to perpetually and unanimously An Asshole? When, precisely, did everything he said get immediately categorized as a “rant” or “controversial” regardless of the actual content? I want to say it was around the time when he said that George Bush didn’t care about black people on live tv. Hmm. Odd. 

Accusations of desperate grasps at attention and relevancy—that “Yeezus” is just Kanye’s “politcal phase,” like how “808’s” was his “sad phase”—completely ignore the political undercurrents that have characterized Kanye’s music from the very beginning. On “We Don’t Care,” or in other words the mainstream world’s introduction to Kanye, literally within the first four bars he taunts, “We wasn’t supposed to make it past 25/ Joke’s on you, we still alive,” referencing the same forced entropy from institutionalized racism that he’s dealing with in “New Slaves” and “Black Skinhead.” And while Kanye’s discography in general is usually acknowledged as more personal interpretations of racism, this isn’t entirely accurate. The fairly explicit political themes of “My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy” were largely ignored due to most of its standout singles being more inwardly focused (the star-studded yet thematically unremarkable “Monster,” the intensely personal “Runaway,” the fictional narrative of “All of the Lights”). Yet “Dark Fantasy,” “Gorgeous,” “Power,” “Hell of a Life,” and “Who Will Survive in America” are aggressively political and lay a very clear foundation for the messages of his new songs. In fact, it’s very easy to look at his career and accumulation of a padding of super-celebrity as a preparation for this very moment with “New Slaves.” He had all the ideas before; he just wasn’t yet in the position to fully unleash them, because not enough people would be forced to hear him in 2003, or even in 2010. In “Power” Kanye asks, clearly to himself, “You got the power to let power go?”  but it goes unanswered, the clock ticking. “New Slaves” is him affirmatively answering that question (“Black Skinhead”s bridge, “I’m doin 500 I’m outta control now/ But there’s nowhere to go now/ And there’s no way to slow down” is the sound of him letting that power go and free-falling), which is in itself a sort of follow-up to the questions posed in one of his first singles, “Jesus Walks.” That is, if I get the balls to make music about something that is actually important (in this case, unabashed belief in god), is anyone going to respond, and will I hate myself less? (“Well if this take away from my spins, which’ll probably take away from my ends/ Well I hope it take away from my sins.”) Except ten years later, money is not an issue, and neither is the prospect of heaven—it’s clear that by this point Kanye no longer believes in a god anymore at all. And that’s why he has to become one himself.

Human being to the mob
What’s a mob to a king?
What’s a king to a god?
What’s a god to a non-believer?
Who don’t believe in anything?

We made it out alive
(“No Church In The Wild”)



This. This. This. All of this.

Look, I’ve made no secret of the fact that I’m less enamoured sonically of Kanye’s Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy-era stuff (but still like the album a great deal) but anyone who’s equated the sonic shifts in his music and the evolution of his public persona as indicative of changes in who he is or what he stands for either weren’t paying attention then or aren’t paying attention now.

Meaghan clearly spent a hell of a lot of time thinking about and writing this and it’s wonderful and you need to read it.

theremixbaby:

“Lose To Win” by Fantasia (2013)

Shame nobody is talking about this (really good) album. Fantasia has one of the most powerful voices in R&B right now.

This is an important post. And a great album.

ssshutuppp:

I WAS WAITING FOR THIS TO ARRIVE OH MY ACTUAL GOD

(Also, ground beef instead of lamb because butchers were closed for Victoria Day.)

(Also, ground beef instead of lamb because butchers were closed for Victoria Day.)

Three hours later, and it ended up pretty decent? The onions in the mejadra were sautéed instead of fried, alas, but still good.

Three hours later, and it ended up pretty decent? The onions in the mejadra were sautéed instead of fried, alas, but still good.

samlansky:

The year’s most jaw-droppingly lovely single gets an (unsurprisingly) jaw-droppingly lovely video. 

goddammitganon:

fun fact i learned yesterday: a group of pugs is called a “grumble” 

image

A GRUMBLE OF PUGS.

A.

GRUMBLE.

OF.

PUGS.

ASDFDKSAJKAWEJK??!?!

DEAD.

Harper government withheld documents in indigenous human-rights case

jakke:

The Harper government withheld tens of thousands of documents that it was obligated to disclose as part of a human-rights case in which it is accused of discriminating against indigenous children. Now, it is using its failure to hand over the files to try to get the proceedings put on hold.

The First Nations Child and Family Caring Society filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in 2007 saying it is wrong for the federal government to pay 22 per cent less for child welfare on reserves than the provinces pay for non-aboriginal welfare services.

Despite many attempts by the government to have the case dismissed, the hearings before the tribunal finally began in February of this year.

But, next Tuesday, Justice Department lawyers will ask for an adjournment of many months while they gather more than 50,000 documents that were required to have already been handed over to the Caring Society’s lawyers under the human-rights commission rules.

Hey so when the federal government got caught illegally hiding 50,000 documents which it was required to turn over for what could potentially be a very large and expensive human rights case, they responded by insisting that they needed the whole proceeding adjourned for months while they collected all those documents.

That’s it. That’s exactly what happened. That’s just how things are now.